From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wrenn v. Marknooth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 28, 2011
Civil No. 09-703-TC (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-703-TC

11-28-2011

JERY JAY WRENN, Petitioner, v, MARKNOOTH, Respondent.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 7, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

________________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wrenn v. Marknooth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 28, 2011
Civil No. 09-703-TC (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Wrenn v. Marknooth

Case Details

Full title:JERY JAY WRENN, Petitioner, v, MARKNOOTH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 09-703-TC (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2011)