From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 8, 1992
596 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-01845.

January 22, 1992. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert Bonanno, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We find merit only in Wray's argument that the trial court improperly imposed court costs as a condition of probation without citing proper statutory authority. Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), review denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1987); Moore v. State, 525 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the imposition of court costs be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition with citation of proper statutory authority.

Affirmed and remanded.

THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 8, 1992
596 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Wray v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA WRAY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 8, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Sutton v. State

On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law expressed in this opinion.…

Martin v. State

The record does not reflect the authority for imposing such costs in this case. See Wray v. State, 596 So.2d…