From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WP Associates v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Nov 7, 2001
24642 (Haw. Nov. 7, 2001)

Opinion

24642

November 7, 2001.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(BY: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Petitioner WP Associates petition for a writ of mandamus and/or writ of prohibition, the papers in support, and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied without prejudice to Petitioner raising any issue related to the post judgment motions and subsequent orders in the pending appeal. See HRAP Rule 4(a)(2)(in any case where a notice of appeal has been filed prematurely, such notice shall be considered as filed immediately after the time the judgment becomes final for the purposes of appeal); and HRAP Rule 4(a)(3) (the notice of appeal shall be deemed to appeal disposition of all post-judgment motions that are filed within 10 days after entry of judgment).


Summaries of

WP Associates v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Nov 7, 2001
24642 (Haw. Nov. 7, 2001)
Case details for

WP Associates v. Crandall

Case Details

Full title:WP ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE VIRGINIA LEA CRANDALL, JUDGE…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Nov 7, 2001

Citations

24642 (Haw. Nov. 7, 2001)