From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worthington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2001
67 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 0558-01, 0559-01

September 12, 2001

Appeal fron 183rd District Court, Harris County; Jay W. Burnett, Judge.

On State's Petition For Discretionary Review, From The Court Of Appeals, 14th Supreme Judicial District.

Shawna L. Reagin, Houston, for appellant.

Jeffrey L. Van Horn, Asst. State's Atty., Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


A jury convicted Appellant of murder and assessed his punishment at forty years. The trial court later revoked Appellant's probation for burglary and assessed punishment at ten years, cumulated with the murder sentence. The Court of Appeals held that the cumulation order was improper under Article 42.08 (a), V.A.C.C.P.,due to the order of the convictions. It modified the cumulation order and affirmed the conviction as reformed.Worthington v. State, 38 S.W.3d 815 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001).

The State filed a petition for discretionary review, contending that the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the trial court's cumulation order was improper. At the time the Court of Appeals handed down its opinion, it did not have the benefit of this Court's decision in Pettigrew v. State, 48 S.W.3d 769 (Tex.Crim.App., 2001).

Accordingly, we grant the State's petition for discretionary review, vacate the Court of Appeals' judgment, and remand this cause to that court in light of Pettigrew.


Summaries of

Worthington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2001
67 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)
Case details for

Worthington v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM S. WORTHINGTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 12, 2001

Citations

67 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Martinez

Second, a Texas court of appeals recently refused to extend McJunkins to a passive waiver of the statutory…

McGown v. State

Therefore, to the extent that appellant's authority relies on such a comparison, we do not find that case to…