From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worthen v. Franklin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 25, 2006
No. CIV-05-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-05-1090-C.

January 25, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Petitioner in this case is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. He seeks relief from the retroactive application of an Oklahoma Department of Corrections policy which he argues denies him various constitutional rights. Additionally, he seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the same policy. On December 14, 2005, and January 9, 2006, Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach issued Reports and Recommendations recommending that both the habeas corpus and declaratory judgment relief be denied. Petitioner has timely responded, and the Court considers the matter de novo.

The relevant facts and controlling law are clearly and fairly set out in the two reports of the Magistrate Judge and need not be repeated here. In objection, Petitioner merely repeats and restates the arguments contained in his earlier pleadings. However, no argument of fact or law is sufficient to counsel or permit a result contrary to that recommended by Judge Bacharach.

Accordingly, the Reports and Recommendations are adopted, in their entirety, and for the reasons stated therein, the relief request by Petitioner is denied. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Worthen v. Franklin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 25, 2006
No. CIV-05-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Worthen v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY ALLEN WORTHEN, Petitioner, v. ERIC FRANKLIN, Warden, James Crabtree…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 25, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-05-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 25, 2006)