From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worth v. Worth

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 19, 1989
554 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-854.

December 19, 1989.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Richard Yale Feder, Judge.

Nancy Schleifer, Miami, for appellant.

James C. Shepherd, Fort Lauderdale, and Harold Peter Barkas, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


Concluding that jurisdiction is concurrent in both Ohio and Florida, we reverse the trial court's order determining that it had exclusive jurisdiction. See Newcomb v. Newcomb, 507 So.2d 1145 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Hickey v. Baxter, 461 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); § 61.1308, Fla. Stat. (1987). Future motions should be considered under the forum non conveniens provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Genoe v. Genoe, 515 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1987); § 61.1316, Fla. Stat. (1987).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Worth v. Worth

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 19, 1989
554 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Worth v. Worth

Case Details

Full title:NANCY WORTH, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD C. WORTH, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 19, 1989

Citations

554 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Alvarez v. Alvarez

Our court has acknowledged, in common with other courts which have considered the issue and the comment to…