From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worth v. Ebinger Baking Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

December, 1928.


Judgment dismissing complaint reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, under the circumstances related by plaintiff, the placing of soapy water on the floor with a mop at the spot where plaintiff was just about to cross, raised a question of fact for the jury on the negligence of the defendant, which is the only question presented on this appeal. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Worth v. Ebinger Baking Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Worth v. Ebinger Baking Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIA WORTH, Appellant, v. EBINGER BAKING COMPANY, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Shearod v. Forty-First and Park Avenue Corporation

( Abbott v. Richmond County Country Club, 211 App. Div. 231; affd., 240 N.Y. 693.) The case of Worth v.…

Rigney v. Horn Hardart Co., Inc.

I hold that there were questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury. The motion to dismiss the…