From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worrell v. Wayne Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6085

05-29-2013

DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; MOUNT OLIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRANSON VICKORY, III; MIKE RICKS; LT. TOMMY BROWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03121-FL) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Demar Worrell appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney's Office, No. 5:12-ct-03121-FL (E.D.N.C., Dec. 6, 2012). We deny as moot Worrell's motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Worrell v. Wayne Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Worrell v. Wayne Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

Case Details

Full title:DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2013)