From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wormly v. Noriega

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2404 MCE CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2404 MCE CMK P.

August 22, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's petition for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 31, 2006 petition for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Wormly v. Noriega

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2404 MCE CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Wormly v. Noriega

Case Details

Full title:GERALD WORMLY, Plaintiff, v. A. NORIEGA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2404 MCE CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)