From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wormley v. District of Columbia

U.S.
Apr 29, 1901
181 U.S. 402 (1901)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Nos. 101, 102.

Submitted November 12, 1900. Decided April 29, 1901.

Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U.S. 45, and French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante, 324, followed.

Mr. D.W. Baker, Mr. John C. Gittings and Mr. Malcom Hufty for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Andrew B. Duvall and Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg for defendant in error.


And now, April 29, 1901, the judgments in the foregoing cases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U.S. 45, and French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante, 324.


Summaries of

Wormley v. District of Columbia

U.S.
Apr 29, 1901
181 U.S. 402 (1901)
Case details for

Wormley v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:WORMLEY v . DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ALLEN v . DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 29, 1901

Citations

181 U.S. 402 (1901)

Citing Cases

Lyon v. Mayor C.C. of Hyattsville

" Without quoting from other cases, see Tonawanda v. Lyon, 181 U.S. 389; Cass Farm Co. v. Detroit, 181 U.S.…

Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. Township Council

They are: (a) Lombard v. W. Chicago Park Comm'rs., 181 U.S. 33, 21 S.Ct. 507, 45 L.Ed. 731 (1901); (b)…