From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wormley v. Baeosk

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 5, 2024
4:23-CV-00579-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 5, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-CV-00579-LPR

02-05-2024

BRYAN O'NEAL WORMLEY #117888 PLAINTIFF v. BAEOSK, Deputy Officer, Pulaski County Detention Center DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Doc. 27.

Defendant Baeosk's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Baeosk are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution for each reason set forth in the RD. The Clerk is directed to close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

There is one small exception-although Defendant sought dismissal with prejudice, the Court adopts Judge Volpe's recommendation to dismiss this case without prejudice. Dismissal with prejudice seems too harsh a remedy in these particular circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wormley v. Baeosk

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 5, 2024
4:23-CV-00579-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Wormley v. Baeosk

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN O'NEAL WORMLEY #117888 PLAINTIFF v. BAEOSK, Deputy Officer, Pulaski…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 5, 2024

Citations

4:23-CV-00579-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 5, 2024)