From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worlds v. Sentry Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-98 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-98

04-02-2012

CAROLYN WORLDS, Plaintiff, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, A MUTUAL COMPANY Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This case was removed to this Court from the Allen Superior Court by the Defendant based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 2.) The Notice of Removal alleges that "Plaintiff, Carolyn Worlds, is an Indiana resident with a primary residence at 3618 Avondale Drive, Fort Wayne, Indiana." (Notice of Removal ¶ 5.)

Defendant's Notice of Removal, however, is inadequate because the "residency" of each party is meaningless for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, as "citizenship is what matters." Guar. Nat'l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs., 101 F.3d 57, 58-59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that statements concerning a party's "residency" are not proper allegations of citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332. "It is well-settled that when the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the court must dismiss the suit." Held v. Held, 137 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see generally Smoot v. Mazda Motors of Am., Inc., 469 F.3d 675, 677-78 (7th Cir. 2006). Therefore, as citizenship does not necessarily equate with residence, Dahlstrom v. Simon, No. 00 C 5189, 2000 WL 1231391, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2000), alleging that the Plaintiff is an Indiana resident does not establish her citizenship.

Accordingly, the Court must be advised of Plaintiff Carolyn Worlds's citizenship, not residency. "[F]or natural persons, state citizenship is determined by one's domicile." Dausch v. Rykse, 9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see also Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., ___ F.3d _, 2012 WL 372988, at *1 (7th Cir. Feb. 7, 2012) ("But residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile—that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run."); Am.'s Best Inns, Inc., 980 F.2d at 1074 ("In federal law citizenship means domicile, not residence.").

Therefore, Defendant is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended Notice of Removal on or before April 16, 2012, properly alleging the citizenship of Plaintiff Carolyn Worlds.

SO ORDERED.

_________

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Worlds v. Sentry Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-98 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Worlds v. Sentry Ins.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN WORLDS, Plaintiff, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, A MUTUAL COMPANY Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-98 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 2, 2012)