Opinion
Case No. 2:04CV107DAK.
June 16, 2004
ORDER
On June 14, 2004, Defendant filed a motion to dispense with the oral argument set on his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for improper venue. Defendant moves pursuant to DUCivR 7-1(f), asking this court to determine the motion on the basis of the written memoranda of the parties. Plaintiff has not had an opportunity to respond to Defendant's request to dispense with oral argument. However, because of the time constraints associated with this motion, the court issues the following Order.
The court has reviewed the parties briefing on the motion to Dismiss, and based on Defendant's motion to dispense with oral argument, the court determines that oral argument would not significantly aid in its determination of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and that the matter can be submitted and determined on the basis of the written memoranda of the parties. Accordingly, the oral argument on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss set for June 30, 2004, at 3:00 p.m. is VACATED. The court will issue a ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in due course.