From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worden v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 23, 2015
2:08-CV-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          Steven N. Geise, JONES DAY, San Diego, California, Leah Pike, JONES DAY, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY.

          WHITFIELD SHARP LAW OFFICE, ELAINE WHITFIELD SHARP, (Pro hac vice), Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JUNE M. WORDEN AND LEONARD M. WORDEN.


          STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41, Plaintiffs June M. Worden and Leonard R. Worden ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("Reynolds") by and through their respective counsel, hereby jointly request that the complaint and all claims asserted in the above-referenced action by and between Plaintiffs and Reynolds be dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the stipulation between Plaintiffs June M. Worden and Leonard R. Worden and Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs' complaint and all claims asserted therein against Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company is dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Worden v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 23, 2015
2:08-CV-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Worden v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUNE M. WORDEN and LEONARD R. WORDEN, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Mar 23, 2015

Citations

2:08-CV-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)