Opinion
2:22-cv-01691-CDS-BNW
11-23-2022
FRANCIS WOOTERS, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC; INNO VIS DATA SOLUTIONS, INC.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC dba BEST EGG; CAPITAL ONE BANK USA N.A.; FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; and SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL dba SYNCB/CAR CARE PEP BOYS, Defendants.
BALLARD SPAHR LLP BY JOEL E. TASCA, ESQ. ANDREW S. CLARK, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK KIND LAW BY MICHAEL KIND, ESQ. GEORGE HAINES, ESQ. GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BALLARD SPAHR LLP BY JOEL E. TASCA, ESQ. ANDREW S. CLARK, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
KIND LAW BY MICHAEL KIND, ESQ. GEORGE HAINES, ESQ. GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(Second Request)
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s response to Plaintiff Francis Wooters's complaint currently is due November 21, 2022. JPMorgan Chase Bank has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that JPMorgan Chase Bank shall have up to and including December 5, 2022, to respond to Plaintiffs complaint. Counsel for JPMorgan and Plaintiff have had preliminary discussions on resolving Plaintiff's claims against JPMorgan, and the additional time will provide the parties the opportunity to resolve those claims before JPMorgan files a responsive pleading.
This is the second request for such an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.