Opinion
2:22-cv-01691-CDS-BNW
11-01-2022
FRANCIS WOOTERS, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC; INNOVIS DATA SOLUTIONS, INC.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC dba BEST EGG; CAPITAL ONE BANK USA N.A.; FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; and SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL dba SYNCB/CAR CARE PEP BOYS, Defendants.
Joel E. Tasca, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14124 Andrew S. Clark Nevada Bar No. 14854 BALLARD SPAHR LLP Attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. KIND LAW By: /s/ Gerardo Avalos Michael Kind, Esq. 8860 George Haines, Esq. Gerardo Avalos, Esq. FREEDOM LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joel E. Tasca, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14124 Andrew S. Clark Nevada Bar No. 14854 BALLARD SPAHR LLP Attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
KIND LAW By: /s/ Gerardo Avalos Michael Kind, Esq. 8860 George Haines, Esq. Gerardo Avalos, Esq. FREEDOM LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(First Request)
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s response to Plaintiff Francis Wooters's complaint currently is due October 31, 2022. JPMorgan Chase Bank has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that JPMorgan Chase Bank shall have up to and including November 21, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, to provide time for JPMorgan Chase Bank to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and for the parties to discuss a potential early resolution of the claims asserted against JPMorgan Chase Bank.
This is the first request for such an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED