Opinion
Civil Action 5:23-cv-00064-TES-CHW
10-16-2024
DAVID WOOTEN, Plaintiff, v. ALICIA WARD, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
Neither party objected to the United States Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 38] regarding Defendant Alicia Ward's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 30]. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a)(1) & (d). Having reviewed the R&R for clear error, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 33] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, because the undisputed facts do not support Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim, and because Defendant Ward is entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, the Court GRANTS Defendant Ward's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 30].
SO ORDERED.