Wooten v. State of Georgia

2 Citing cases

  1. McDaniel v. Pass

    130 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 3 times

    Further, the questions for decision were easily found in the record. Satcher v. James H. Drew Shows, Inc., 122 Ga. App. 548 (1) ( 177 S.E.2d 846); Jenkins v. Raiford, 117 Ga. App. 658 ( 161 S.E.2d 405); and Wooten v. State, 118 Ga. App. 366 (1b) ( 163 S.E.2d 870). Also see American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 120 Ga. App. 1(1) (169 S.E.2d 342), where it was held that a failure to comply with the above rules requiring pagination would not preclude consideration of the alleged errors if the inconvenience thus occasioned is insubstantial.

  2. Sparks v. Sparks

    125 Ga. App. 198 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)   Cited 8 times

    We held the motion to be without merit since the appeal was from the dismissal of a petition and "is easily found in the record." See also Jenkins v. Raiford, 117 Ga. App. 658 (1) ( 161 S.E.2d 405); Wooten v. State of Ga., 118 Ga. App. 366 (1a) ( 163 S.E.2d 870). See Judge Pannell's dissent in Cohen v. Garland, 119 Ga. App. 333, 340 ( 167 S.E.2d 599), for a collection of cases holding that failure to meet the pagination rule will result in an abandonment of the enumeration of error.