From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
May 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-4021 (S.D. Tex. May. 18, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-4021.

May 18, 2010


ORDER


James E. Wooten sued his insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in Texas state court, seeking uninsured motorist benefits. (Docket Entry No. 1-1). State Farm timely removed based on diversity jurisdiction. (Docket Entry No. 1). In his state-court petition, Wooten sought a declaratory judgment, economic damages, noneconomic damages, punitive or exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, interest, and costs of suit. (Docket Entry No. 1-1 at 10). State Farm moved for partial summary judgment that under Texas law, Wooten cannot recover punitive damages under the underinsured motorist provision. (Docket Entry No. 5). Wooten responded by filing an amended complaint. (Docket Entry No. 7). Wooten's amended complaint does not seek recovery of punitive damages. ( Id. at 7). Because Wooten no longer seeks punitive damages, State Farm's motion for partial summary judgment is moot.


Summaries of

Wooten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
May 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-4021 (S.D. Tex. May. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Wooten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. WOOTEN, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: May 18, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-4021 (S.D. Tex. May. 18, 2010)