From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 30, 2000
16 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76047

February 15, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied: May 30, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Michael P. David

Mary S. Choi, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorney for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stacy L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER

Appellant, Anthony Wooten, ("appellant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Appellant seeks to vacate his convictions and sentences for first-degree assault, section 565.050, RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, section 571.015, two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030, and possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, for which appellant was sentenced to a total term of thirty years in prison. We affirm.

All statutory references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 30, 2000
16 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Wooten v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WOOTEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)