From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. FCI McKean Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 27, 2020
C.A. No. 18-334 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

C.A. No. 18-334 Erie

03-27-2020

ROBERT WOOTEN, Petitioner, v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action for habeas corpus relief was received by the Clerk of Court on October 26, 2018. In his habeas petition, Petitioner seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, pursuant to the "savings clause" of 28 U.S.C. 2255(e), which allows a federal prisoner to challenge the validity of his underlying conviction where it "appears that the remedy by [§2255 petition] is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention." The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo, for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

On January 29, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be dismissed because it constitutes an abuse of the writ and it fails to satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). [ECF No. 19]. In particular, Judge Lanzillo concluded that Petitioner already filed a § 2255 petition raising the precise issue raised in the instant § 2241 petition, and has failed to claim that he was convicted of conduct that was subsequently decriminalized by a change in the law, which is the first of two conditions that must be satisfied by a federal prisoner in order to take advantage of § 2255's savings clause under In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245,251 (3d Cir. 1997) (Id. at pp. 6-7). Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the R&R.

Thus, after de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2020,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED, with prejudice, and the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued on January 29, 2020 [ECF No. 19], is adopted as the opinion of this Court. As there are no further matters pending before the Court relative to the instant petition, the Clerk is directed to mark this case "CLOSED."

/s/_________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge cc: The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo

United States Magistrate Judge

All parties of record


Summaries of

Wooten v. FCI McKean Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 27, 2020
C.A. No. 18-334 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Wooten v. FCI McKean Warden

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WOOTEN, Petitioner, v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

C.A. No. 18-334 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2020)