From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. Aiola

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0682 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0682 JAM EFB P.

May 13, 2011


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 22, 2011, the court ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 30-day period set in the March 22, 2011 order has expired and plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis application, paid the appropriate filing fee, or otherwise responded to the order.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 12, 2011.


Summaries of

Wooten v. Aiola

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0682 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Wooten v. Aiola

Case Details

Full title:MARIO WOOTEN, Plaintiff, v. NEWMAN AIOLA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0682 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)