From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woolman v. Time Warner

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 2, 2013
543 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-3079

12-02-2013

Michael Brian Woolman Plaintiff - Appellant v. Time Warner; Facebook.com Defendants - Appellees


Appeal rrom United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln


[Unpublished]

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Michael Woolman appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se action for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order. We conclude that the court was well within its discretion to dismiss the action, because Woolman failed to comply with the court's order to file an amended complaint by a certain date, and the court had expressly warned Woolman that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of his claims. Further, the dismissal was without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Schooley v. Kennedy, 712 F.2d 372, 374 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (lesser sanction of dismissal without prejudice militates against finding that court abused its discretion in dismissing under Rule 41(b)).

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny as moot the pending motion for discovery.


Summaries of

Woolman v. Time Warner

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 2, 2013
543 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Woolman v. Time Warner

Case Details

Full title:Michael Brian Woolman Plaintiff - Appellant v. Time Warner; Facebook.com…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 2, 2013

Citations

543 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Null

A "dismissal without prejudice" is one such "less severe sanction." Id.; see Woolman v. Time Warner, 543 F.…