From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooldridge v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 30, 2004
680 N.W.2d 420 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 125089.

April 30, 2004.


SC: 125089, AGC: 2059/03.

On the order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is treated as a complaint for superintending control and is considered. Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.


Summaries of

Wooldridge v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 30, 2004
680 N.W.2d 420 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

Wooldridge v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS H. WOOLDRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 30, 2004

Citations

680 N.W.2d 420 (Mich. 2004)