From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wool v. Larner

Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1942
May 5, 1942
26 A.2d 93 (Vt. 1942)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 5, 1942.

ACTION OF TORT for negligence. Trial by jury, at the September, 1940, Term of Chittenden County Court, Adams, J., presiding. Verdict directed for defendants. Reversed and remanded.

Robert M. Rosenberg, A. Pearley Feen and Louis Lisman for plaintiff. M.G. Leary, M.G. Leary, Jr. and Bernard J. Leddy for defendants.

Present: MOULTON, C.J., SHERBURNE, BUTTLES, STURTEVANT and JEFFORDS, JJ.


This case was tried below with the case entitled Erna T. Wool v. Arthur L. Larner, et al. The questions here presented are the same as those disposed of in the opinion in that case handed down at the present term of this Court. 26 A.2d 89.

For the reasons stated in that opinion the entry in this case is: Judgment affirmed as to the defendant William E. McBride. As to the defendants Arthur L. Larner and Anna K. Larner the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.


Summaries of

Wool v. Larner

Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1942
May 5, 1942
26 A.2d 93 (Vt. 1942)
Case details for

Wool v. Larner

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS P. WOOL v. ARTHUR L. LARNER ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1942

Date published: May 5, 1942

Citations

26 A.2d 93 (Vt. 1942)
26 A.2d 93