From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woody v. Mnuchin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:20-cv-02328-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02328-TLN-AC

07-01-2021

JOHN F. WOODY, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN MNUCHIN, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff John F. Woody, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 15.) On June 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 16.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Plaintiff has been aware since at least April 14, 2021, that he was required to pay the filing fee in order to proceed with this action or face dismissal. Plaintiffs June 2, 2021 objections indicate he has the capacity and intent to immediately pay the required fee (see ECF No. 16 at 2), but a review of the case reflects that, to date, he has still failed to do so. His objections are therefore overruled.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 17, 2021 (ECF No. 15), are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woody v. Mnuchin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:20-cv-02328-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Woody v. Mnuchin

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. WOODY, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN MNUCHIN, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02328-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)