From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodworth v. Hardin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

November Term, 1902


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to right of respondent to renew the motion made at Special Term. Held, that under the order of the county judge upon which apparently without other notice the motion resulting in the order appealed from was made, the only question presented was whether the judgment in question had been paid, and that the fact of such payment was not sufficiently established to warrant the order vacating the supplementary proceedings. Adams, P.J., McLennan, Spring, Williams and Hiscock, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Woodworth v. Hardin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Woodworth v. Hardin

Case Details

Full title:Chauncey C. Woodworth, as, etc., Appellant, v. Bryan Hardin, Impleaded…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1902

Citations

77 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)