From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. Pearson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Nov 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11CV543 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11CV543

11-09-2011

JOHN E. WOODWARD, Plaintiff, v. EDDIE PEARSON, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on September 13, 2011, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such actions demonstrate a wilful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff.

It is so ORDERED.

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: November 9, 2011

Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Woodward v. Pearson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Nov 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11CV543 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Woodward v. Pearson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. WOODWARD, Plaintiff, v. EDDIE PEARSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11CV543 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011)