From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. N.Y. City

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2023
217 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

449 Index No. 3384/21 Case No. 2022–03870

06-13-2023

Shakeya WOODWARD, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Shakeya Woodward, appellant pro se. Brownell Partners, PLLC, New York (Chelsea A. Kearney of counsel), for respondents.


Shakeya Woodward, appellant pro se.

Brownell Partners, PLLC, New York (Chelsea A. Kearney of counsel), for respondents.

Oing, J.P., Singh, Moulton, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered on or about April 28, 2022, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously dismissed, without costs, for failure to perfect the appeal in the proper manner.

The appeal from the order is dismissed because plaintiff failed to file a proper appellate record. Plaintiff failed to include the underlying motion to dismiss, her opposition to that motion, and the exhibits annexed to the parties’ submissions (see CPLR 5526 ; Quezada v. Mensch Mgt. Inc., 89 A.D.3d 647, 933 N.Y.S.2d 276 [1st Dept. 2011] ). Without the benefit of a proper record, meaningful review of this matter is impossible given that Supreme Court granted the motion based in part on the documentary evidence annexed to the parties’ submissions (see UBS Sec. LLC v. Red Zone LLC, 77 A.D.3d 575, 579, 910 N.Y.S.2d 55 [1st Dept. 2010], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 706, 2011 WL 2568003 [2011] ).


Summaries of

Woodward v. N.Y. City

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2023
217 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Woodward v. N.Y. City

Case Details

Full title:Shakeya WOODWARD, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 13, 2023

Citations

217 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
217 A.D.3d 522