From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 26, 2002
300 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

92075

Decided and Entered: December 26, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Richard A. Glickel, West Nyack, for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Lahtinen and, Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT


Petitioner, a confidential criminal investigator for the Rockland County District Attorney's office, allegedly sustained neck and back injuries after he fell from a stepladder while attempting to retrieve a case file from the basement archives of the County office building. He subsequently filed an application for accidental disability retirement benefits which was denied by the New York State and Local Retirement System. Following a hearing and redetermination, respondent denied petitioner's application, finding that the April 25, 1995 incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 63. Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. We confirm.

"`[A]n injury that occurs without an unexpected event, as the result of activity undertaken in the performance of ordinary employment duties (considered in view of the particular employment in question) is not an accidental injury'" (Matter of Tuper v. McCall, 259 A.D.2d 941, 941, quoting Matter of Cadiz v. McCall, 236 A.D.2d 766, 766). Here, petitioner stated that his duties as a confidential investigator were prescribed by the District Attorney. He testified at the hearing that he devised the system for maintaining old case files in the archives and was asked by the District Attorney to search for the file in question because neither a secretary nor an investigator could locate it. Petitioner further testified that he was at the top of the metal platform of the stepladder with one box resting on it and was leaning forward to look through individual files contained in a second box when the stepladder tipped to the side causing him to fall. No unexpected event or outside force caused the ladder to fall. We, therefore, find that the incident does not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363 (see Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012). Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports respondent's finding that petitioner's injury occurred in the ordinary course of his duties and not from an unexpected event, it must be upheld (see Matter of Van Roten v. McCall, 276 A.D.2d 944, 945).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Woodward v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 26, 2002
300 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Woodward v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES WOODWARD, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 26, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Weisensel v. Hevesi

Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. We confirm.…

In the Matter of O'Brien v. Hevesi

Addressing the remaining claim, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Comptroller's…