From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1985
113 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

September 27, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Lawton, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision of Lawton, J., on the motion to set aside the verdict. We add only that defendant's counsel stated in his brief and in the record that the reduction in the verdict to $100,000 "was consented to by both parties in lieu of a new trial and solely on the issue of damages." (Emphasis added.) Defendant, therefore, cannot now complain about the amount of the verdict. If we were to reach that issue we would hold that the verdict, as reduced, was not excessive.


Summaries of

Woodward v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1985
113 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Woodward v. City of Utica

Case Details

Full title:BARRY WOODWARD, Respondent, v. CITY OF UTICA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1985

Citations

113 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)