From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. Beam

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 19, 2008
07-CV-645 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-645.

November 19, 2008


ORDER


This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 15, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to enter judgment for failure to comply with discovery order. On August 26, 2008, Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff's motion for judgment be denied.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 3, 2008. Defendants filed a response to the objections on September 19, 2008.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's motion for judgment is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodward v. Beam

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 19, 2008
07-CV-645 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Woodward v. Beam

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN WOODWARD, 00-A-6563, Plaintiff, v. BEAM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

07-CV-645 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Broad. Music, Inc. v. Metro Lounge & Cafe LLC

The party in question, particularly a pro se litigant, must have had prior notice that violation of the…