From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodview Villa v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1965
213 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued September 22, 1965 Reargued November 29, 1965

Decided December 30, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK S. McCULLOUGH, J.

Arnold P. Etelson and Jesse I. Etelson for appellant.

Herbert Decker for respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Ruth Kessler Toch, Daniel Polansky, Morris N. Lissauer and Henriette Frieder of counsel).


Order modified, without costs, by granting plaintiff partial summary judgment for $250 for legal expenses incurred in New Jersey and by dismissing without prejudice the complaint as to other relief sought. On this record, plaintiff was entitled to recover for legal services incurred in the defense of the New Jersey proceedings. The Attorney-General's brief submitted on the jurisdictional issue suggests that the New York Workmen's Compensation Board has exclusive jurisdiction to determine "all questions relating to the payment of claims" under the Workmen's Compensation Law. We agree that the board has jurisdiction on an appropriate application to decide, as between the plaintiff and defendant carrier, the extent of liability, if any, which has been incurred by defendant under the compensation policy by reason of the injury of plaintiff's employee in the New York accident.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Woodview Villa v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1965
213 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Woodview Villa v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WOODVIEW VILLA, INC., Appellant, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1965

Citations

213 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1965)
213 N.E.2d 893
266 N.Y.S.2d 813

Citing Cases

Toebe v. Employers Mutual of Wausau

Defendant also argues that the Weinberg-Kacur rationale is inadequate for it would allow a New Jersey court…