From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1983
439 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1497.

October 25, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, George Orr, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Sara Bresky Blumberg, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Penny Hershoff Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


Jabo Woodson, defendant below, appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court following a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery with a firearm. The trial court sentenced appellant to life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum sentence of three years for the use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. In addition, the trial court found a number of aggravating circumstances which it felt warranted the retention of jurisdiction over appellant's sentence. Accordingly, the trial court entered an order stating that jurisdiction would be retained for an indefinite period of time. This the trial court may not do. Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), the statute in effect when appellant committed the offense for which he is convicted, allowed a trial court to retain jurisdiction only over the first third of the maximum sentence imposed. Whigham v. State, 404 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Nor may the trial court retain jurisdiction over the first third of the life sentence. While other courts within the state have not yet ruled on this issue directly, see, e.g., Harmon v. State, 438 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1983); Hopkins v. State, 418 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Gaskins v. State, 415 So.2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), the Third District Court of Appeal has adopted the position that where a life sentence is imposed, section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes is inapposite. Since a life span is immeasurable, no calculation of the length of time jurisdiction can be retained can be made. Rodriguez v. State, 424 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Cordero-Pena v. State, 421 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). But see Gaskins v. State, 415 So.2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (Cowart, J., dissenting). Appellant's other point on appeal is without merit.

Affirmed as to appellant's conviction. The mandatory minimum three year sentence for the use of a firearm during the commission of a felony is left undisturbed. The remaining portion of the sentence is vacated for entry of a sentence not inconsistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Woodson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1983
439 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Woodson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JABO WOODSON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 25, 1983

Citations

439 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Stettler v. State

Defendant, Terry Edward Stettler, appeals that portion of his life sentence wherein the trial court retained…

Kosek v. State

The Third District has recently adopted the position that section 947.16(3) is inapplicable where a life…