From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2021
CV19-1401-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CV19-1401-VAP (AGR)

06-29-2021

THOMAS WOODSON, Petitioner, v. NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. No. objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

(1) Respondent’s motion to dismiss based on Younger abstention is GRANTED;

(2) Respondent’s motion to dismiss based on exhaustion is DENIED;

(3) Petitioner’s request for a stay is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice.


Summaries of

Woodson v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2021
CV19-1401-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Woodson v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WOODSON, Petitioner, v. NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

CV19-1401-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)