From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson v. J.D. Huppenthal

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 25, 2008
283 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6644.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 25, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00141).

James Gilbert Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Mario Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, Flaherty, Sensabaugh Bonasso, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., Shuman, McCuskey Slicer, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Gilbert Woodson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson v. Huppenthal, No. 5:07-cv-00141, 2008 WL 828829 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Woodson v. J.D. Huppenthal

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 25, 2008
283 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Woodson v. J.D. Huppenthal

Case Details

Full title:James Gilbert WOODSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.D. HUPPENTHAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 25, 2008

Citations

283 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2008)