From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodsford v. Friendly Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-01996-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-01996-MMD-VCF

02-12-2013

ROBERT J. WOODSFORD, Plaintiff, v. FRIENDLY FORD, a Nevada Corporation, Does I-X and Roe Business Entities I-X, Defendant.

KEMP & KEMP James P. Kemp, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP Scott M. Mahoney, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant


FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
SCOTT M. MAHONEY, ESQ.
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 950
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702)252-3131
Facsimile: (702)252-7411
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties' counsel of record that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. KEMP & KEMP By: James P. Kemp, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP By: Scott M. Mahoney, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Woodsford v. Friendly Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-01996-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Woodsford v. Friendly Ford

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. WOODSFORD, Plaintiff, v. FRIENDLY FORD, a Nevada Corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-01996-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2013)