From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 29, 2018
255 So. 3d 567 (La. 2018)

Opinion

No. 2018-C-1263

10-29-2018

Gilda WOODS v. WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., The Coca-Cola Company a.k.a. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company a.k.a. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., and Jonathan Burden


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. CHARLES

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

In this trip and fall case, the underlying issue is whether two cases of drinks left in the beverage aisle of a grocery store by a distributor created an unreasonable risk of harm, leading to a finding of liability as found by the trial court here, or whether it was an open and obvious condition, which would lead to an opposite result. I would grant and docket the defendant's application in this matter to explore whether the trial court erred in delivering what the court of appeal deemed to be a "compressed" jury instruction regarding the factors used to determine whether a condition is open and obvious. See Broussard v. State, through Office of State Bldgs., Div. of Admin. , 12-1238 (La. 4/5/13), 113 So.3d 175, 184.


Summaries of

Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 29, 2018
255 So. 3d 567 (La. 2018)
Case details for

Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:GILDA WOODS v. WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., THE COCA-COLA COMPANY A.K.A…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 29, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 567 (La. 2018)

Citing Cases

Varnado v. Pa. Mfrs. Ass'n Ins. Co.

La. C.C.P. art. 1792 requires the trial court to instruct the jurors on the law applicable to the cause…

Giglio v. Anpac La. Ins. Co.

The jury in this matter awarded Mr. Giglio $11,024 for past medical expenses; $5,000 for future medical…