From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:23-cv-00233-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00233-JAD-VCF

02-15-2023

Leonard R. Woods, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents


ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, GRANTING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND SCREENING AND SERVING HABEAS PETITION

[ECF NOS. 1, 1-1, 1-2]

Jennifer A Dorsey, U.S. District Judge

Leonard R. Woods is incarcerated at Nevada's High Desert State Prison and brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to challenge his 2019 state-court conviction. Woods applies to proceed in forma pauperis and moves for court-appointed counsel.

ECF No. 1.

ECF No. 1-2.

I. Woods does not qualify for IFP status.

Based on the information provided in the application to proceed in forma pauperis, I find that Woods is able to pay the $5 filing fee for this action, so I deny his in forma pauperis application. However, I will not require Woods to pay the filing fee or file a new in forma pauperis application until after counsel appears for him.

II. Appointment of counsel is warranted.

State prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent a due-process violation. But the court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. Woods's petition indicates that he is serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole, and it appears that he will not be able to adequately litigate this action without counsel. I therefore find that appointing counsel for him is in the interests of justice. So I grant Woods's motion for appointment of counsel and appoint the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) to represent him.

Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam).

See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196.

III. The court directs service of the petition.

I have examined Woods's petition for writ of habeas corpus as mandated by Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and I determine that it merits service upon the respondents. So I order the petition served upon the respondents and direct the respondents to appear, but I do not require any further action on their part at this time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 1] is denied. However, the requirement that petitioner pay the filing fee is suspended until further notice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 1-2] is granted, and the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent the petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent the petitioner, because of a conflict of interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, counsel will represent the petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. The FPD will have 30 days from the date of this order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the court its inability to represent the petitioner in this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to:

SEPARATELY FILE the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1-1] and the Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 1-2];
ELECTRONICALLY SERVE upon the FPD a copy of this order and a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1-1]; and
ADD Aaron Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the Attorney General only.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order to appear in this action, but they will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this time.


Summaries of

Woods v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:23-cv-00233-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Woods v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Leonard R. Woods, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00233-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)