From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Warnock

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Nov 30, 2010
Civil Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL).

November 30, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation (Doc. 20) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, entered November 3, 2010, is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this case be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for lack of prosecution by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed a written objection to the Recommendation, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation (Doc. 20), and this case is dismisssed. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) filed by Defendants is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED, this the 30th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Woods v. Warnock

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Nov 30, 2010
Civil Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Woods v. Warnock

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS A. WOODS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER WARNOCK, JOSH ADCOCK, CAPTAIN…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2010)