From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. State Univ. of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 14, 2017
70 N.E.3d 477 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

02-14-2017

In the Matter of Norman WOODS et al., Respondents, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for appellants. Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLP, Albany (Thomas D. Latin of counsel), for respondents.


Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for appellants.

Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLP, Albany (Thomas D. Latin of counsel), for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Robert Rose (139 A.D.3d 1322, 1325, 33 N.Y.S.3d 484 ), and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court.Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.

Judge WILSON took no part.


Summaries of

Woods v. State Univ. of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 14, 2017
70 N.E.3d 477 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Woods v. State Univ. of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Norman WOODS et al., Respondents, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Feb 14, 2017

Citations

70 N.E.3d 477 (N.Y. 2017)
70 N.E.3d 477
47 N.Y.S.3d 726

Citing Cases

Woods v. State Univ. of N.Y.

On appeal, this Court, with two justices dissenting, reversed and granted the petition to compel arbitration…