From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 77689

December 12, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE PHILIP J. SWEENEY

Douglas R. Hoff, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for Appellant.

John M. Morris III, Supreme Court Building, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper, III, J.

ORDER



Alfred Woods appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing in that his trial counsel was ineffective for informing him that upon pleading guilty he would be eligible for long term drug treatment or 120 day shock probation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion's court decision was not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Woods v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Woods v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED WOODS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)