Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Woods v. State

71 So. 3d 1241 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Woods v. State

19 Citing cases

  1. Tanner v. State

    332 So. 3d 382 (Miss. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 3 times

    "A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently." Woods v. State , 71 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). This standard is met if "the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of the plea."

  2. Wilson v. State

    295 So. 3d 566 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 2 times

    "A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently." Woods v. State , 71 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). A defendant's plea meets this standard if "the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge[s] against him and the consequences of his plea."

  3. Hayes v. State

    301 So. 3d 45 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 5 times

    "A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently." Woods v. State , 71 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). "A plea is voluntary if the defendant knows what the elements are in the charge against him, including an understanding of the charge and its relation to him, the effect of the plea, and the possible sentence."

  4. Burns v. State

    187 So. 3d 1080 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016)

    ¶ 25. “A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently.” Woods v. State, 71 So.3d 1241, 1244 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2011). This standard is met if “the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of the plea.”

  5. Lackaye v. State

    166 So. 3d 560 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 16 times

    “A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently.” Woods v. State, 71 So.3d 1241, 1244 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2011). This standard is met if “the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of the plea.”

  6. Mosley v. State

    150 So. 3d 127 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 16 times

    ¶ 17. “A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently.” Woods v. State, 71 So.3d 1241, 1244 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2011). This standard is met if “the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of the plea.”

  7. Mosley v. State

    NO. 2013-CP-00843-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2013)

    " ¶17. "A guilty plea is binding if entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently." Woods v. State, 71 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). This standard is met if "the defendant is advised concerning the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of the plea."

  8. Willis v. State

    321 So. 3d 584 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 6 times

    Hayes v. State , 301 So. 3d 45, 49 (¶16) (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) (quoting Woods v. State , 71 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) ). "For a guilty plea to be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, the defendant must understand [his] rights, ‘the nature of the charge against [him], and the consequences of [his] plea, including applicable minimum and maximum sentences.’ " Schmidt v. State , 287 So. 3d 1035, 1037-38 (¶9) (Miss.

  9. Faris v. State

    212 So. 3d 107 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016)

    " Watson v. State , 100 So.3d 1034, 1038 (¶ 10) (Miss. Ct. App. 2012) (citing Williams v. State , 31 So.3d 69, 74 (¶ 13) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010) ). "In assessing the voluntariness of a plea, the thoroughness of the trial court's interrogation during the plea colloquy ‘is the most significant evidence of all.’ " Id . at (¶ 12) (quoting Woods v. State , 71 So.3d 1241, 1244 (¶ 9) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) ). The defendant may not rely on bare assertions in his brief.

  10. Neal v. State

    186 So. 3d 378 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 8 times
    In Neal, 186 So.3d 378, the petitioner had made the same claim. Under questioning by the trial court, Neal had admitted that at the time of his offense he was under the influence of Trazadone and morphine.

    Watson v. State, 100 So.3d 1034, 1038 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (citing Williams v. State, 31 So.3d 69, 74 (¶ 13) (Miss.Ct.App.2010)). “In assessing the voluntariness of a plea, the thoroughness of the trial court's interrogation during the plea colloquy ‘is the most significant evidence of all.’ ” Id. at (¶ 12) (quoting Woods v. State, 71 So.3d 1241, 1244 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2011)). The defendant may not rely on bare assertions in his brief.