From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2228 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2228 LKK KJM P.

September 30, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 2, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 20, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied (#9);

3. Respondent is ordered to file an answer within sixty days, and

4. Petitioner may file any traverse within thirty days of the filing of the answer.


Summaries of

Woods v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2228 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Woods v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE J. WOODS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2228 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)