From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Re Inv.

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2022
SC 163870 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

SC 163870 (126) COA: 351972

05-06-2022

ROSA WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RE INVESTMENT, INC., Defendant, and ROSETTA HALL, Plaintiff, and CITIFINANCE, INC., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and CITI, INC., Defendants-Appellees.


Wayne CC: 16-006341-CH

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Elizabeth T. Clement, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion to amend reply brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Woods v. Re Inv.

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2022
SC 163870 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Woods v. Re Inv.

Case Details

Full title:ROSA WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RE INVESTMENT, INC., Defendant, and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

SC 163870 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)