From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Ralston

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jan 30, 2024
1:23-cv-2029 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-2029

01-30-2024

THOMAS E. WOODS, Plaintiff v. GEORGE RALSTON, et al., Defendants


ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, on this 30th day of January 2024, upon consideration of pro se Plaintiff Thomas E. Woods (“Plaintiff”)'s complaint (Doc. No. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A;

2. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order to cure the deficiencies identified in the court's memorandum opinion. Any amended complaint filed pursuant to this order shall be filed to the same docket number as the instant action, shall be entitled “Amended Complaint,” and shall be complete in all respects. It shall be a new pleading that stands by itself as an adequate complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form; and

4. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by the above date, this case shall be dismissed without further leave to amend for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.


Summaries of

Woods v. Ralston

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jan 30, 2024
1:23-cv-2029 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Woods v. Ralston

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS E. WOODS, Plaintiff v. GEORGE RALSTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 30, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-2029 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2024)