From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Napolitano

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 2010
372 F. App'x 743 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-56343.

Submitted March 2, 2010.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 26, 2010.

Kristi A. Hughes, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Raven M. Norris, United States Department of Justice, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:09-CV-00782-DMS-JMA.

Before: RYMER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and KENNELLY, District Judge.

The Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Because this court today denies appellant Eamma Jean Woods' petition for review of the Order of Removal pending against her in a companion case, Woods v. Holder, No. 08-70936, 2010 WL 1174614 (9th Cir. 2010), we dismiss as moot this appeal challenging the bond determination made by an Immigration Judge.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Woods v. Napolitano

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 2010
372 F. App'x 743 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Woods v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:Eamma Jean WOODS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 26, 2010

Citations

372 F. App'x 743 (9th Cir. 2010)