From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2017
9:14-cv-996 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2017)

Opinion

9:14-cv-996 (TJM/DJS)

09-18-2017

WESLEY WOODS, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MILLER, et al., Defendants.


Thomas J. McAvoy, SR. U.S.D.J.

DECISION and ORDER

The Court referred this action alleging constitutional violations by prison officers, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to the Hon. Daniel J. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. The Report-Recommendation, dated August 1, 2017, recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismiss the action.

Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report-Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has passed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice and the Court will adopt the Report-Recommendation.

Accordingly:

The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 56, is hereby ADOPTED. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 48, is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: September 18, 2017

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Woods v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2017
9:14-cv-996 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Woods v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:WESLEY WOODS, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 18, 2017

Citations

9:14-cv-996 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2017)