From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Hanson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 16, 2022
22-cv-05104-JD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-05104-JD

12-16-2022

BARRY DEWAYNE WOODS, Plaintiff, v. D. HANSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REOPENING CASE

JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a civil rights action. The case was dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the filing fee. After the case was closed plaintiff sent a check to the court for $350 but no IFP application. The Court returned the check to plaintiff because the case was closed.

Plaintiff is informed that the full filing fee is $402. He may either submit a check for the full filing fee of $402 or he may submit an IFP application. This case is REOPENED and plaintiff must submit the full filing fee or an IFP application within twenty-eight days of service of this order. Failure to follow these instructions may result in this case being dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woods v. Hanson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 16, 2022
22-cv-05104-JD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Woods v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:BARRY DEWAYNE WOODS, Plaintiff, v. D. HANSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

22-cv-05104-JD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2022)