Opinion
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01263-EJD
10-06-2011
RICK WOODS, Individually and On Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.
MAYER BROWN LLP Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) John M. Neukom (SBN 275887) Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.
MAYER BROWN LLP
Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475)
John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)
Honorable Edward J. Davila
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the named parties hereby stipulate that Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 68) shall be filed no later than October 8, 2011.
If Defendant's response to the Amended Complaint is not an answer, but rather a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, then (i) Plaintiff's opposition to that motion shall be filed no later than November 9, 2011; and (ii) Defendant's reply shall be filed no later than November 18, 2011.
MAYER BROWN LLP
John M. Neukom
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.
NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH LLP
Brad E. Seidel
Attorneys for Plaintiff Rick Woods Filer's Attestation: In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from counsel for Plaintiff, Brad E. Seidel.
John M. Neukom
IT IS SO ORDERED
Edward J. Davila